Hobby Lobby
Jun. 30th, 2014 06:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Am I the only one who things the uproar about the Hobby Lobby case is overblown? It seems that Kennedy is basically holding up a neon sign saying "apply the same let the insurance company pay for the cost of womens contraception compromize" that fully religious organizations have. I mean Obama can direct HHS to do that in a week, and then the women get full coverage for the items in conflict with no addtional burden. Or is it that I've actually read the 90 page opinion, and haven';t been paying attention to the yammering in the news?
no subject
Date: 2014-07-01 12:46 am (UTC)Ultimately, it is none of the employers business how the health care benefit dollars are spent, they have no right to know.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-01 02:41 pm (UTC)http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/best-lines-hobby-lobby-decision
This
Date: 2014-07-01 03:57 pm (UTC)This is a GIANT MESS not because it breaks this small issue over women's health, but because it breaks massive precedents and opens up a wave of trouble. The concurrence is desperately trying to put a finger in that dike but it's hopeless. At the very best we'll get a bunch of cases litigated that in 2-3 years will reach SCOTUS again and Kennedy might side with the liberals to undo some of the damage. On the other hand, in 2-3 years we'll have a Republican party in control of both houses and maybe the Presidency.
This is just going to be bad all up and down the line.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-01 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-01 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 02:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 02:50 pm (UTC)Eta waaagh phone
no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 02:50 pm (UTC)I only have the words you post to go by. There is nothing in your original post making the distinction of who you felt was worthy of regard and who was 'yammering', and as the implication was that anyone concerned with this issue was ignorant and making foolish noises, it's a fair assumption that you meant everyone. I am trying to express to you that this was insulting and offensive, and that admitting you spoke from ignorance may reassure me that you are working on addressing the ignorance itself, it does nothing to address what comes across as a fairly significant insult.
If your only concern here is finding a way to not be wrong, and not with the actual effect of your words, regardless of intent, then that is another reason for deep concern. It says you genuinely do not care if you have been disrespectful and insulting, and I will disengage from this conversation rather than continue it any further.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-01 10:27 pm (UTC)With regard to the contraception issue and my own thoughts:
I am one of the people who uses chemical birth control to address a different problem than contraception. I cannot use alternatives which are "Hobby Lobby approved" to achieve the same result. And as I see it, that is a problem of self-determination. I would want to work in a way that gained me access to that group of drugs. Either I would need to find a job that pays for the prescription as a benefit, or I would need to find a job that pays enough so that I can purchase the prescription on my own outside of the company-provided health care.
Of course, on the other side, if I were a member of a place/country with a single-payer system, I wouldn't run into this problem at all. In that vein, if the US public (i.e. liberals) want a health care system that provides for everyone equally, it should be disassociated with employment entirely.
Edited to add: all of the above continues the assumption that chemical birth control continues to be widely available on the open market. This ruling doesn't restrict market access, only who is paying for it.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 10:33 am (UTC)I brought up the Supreme Court decision at dinner with a friend last night. She and I both went the "corporations are individuals, hunh" route in the conversation. We agreed that this is an interesting precedent, but didn't come to any conclusions.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-03 05:51 pm (UTC)After that, then we can talk about speciality care, and if that should still be handled by an insurance system or direct payer or... something else (I don't know what).