Honestly, the thing that made me the most uncomfortable about the whole Harriet Miers deal was that Bush apparantly thought he could nominate an inexperienced croney and get her confirmed just because he wanted her to be.
The conspiracy theorist in me, though, wants to think that Miers was a deliberate choice. Bush *knew* he couldn't get her confirmed, but nominating her was a sop. Now he's free to nominate some scary conservative white male. Gah. Who, me, paranoid?
I don't think Bush is the sort to put up a sacrifical lamb. I mean he just got *DONE* getting through a scary conservative white mail with Roberts. I think Bush though all the conservatives would take a "Trust me" from him, and they obviously didn't.
I know I'm being a little silly and paranoid. Or at least I hope so. I just can't imagine anyone genuinely thinking that a croney with no record to speak of and NO judicial experience at all was going to get confirmed. It smells like a setup to me. But you may be right about the "trust me".
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
gsh
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 02:35 pm (UTC)The conspiracy theorist in me, though, wants to think that Miers was a deliberate choice. Bush *knew* he couldn't get her confirmed, but nominating her was a sop. Now he's free to nominate some scary conservative white male. Gah. Who, me, paranoid?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 05:04 pm (UTC)Well, we are talking Bush here. He ain't the sharpest tool in the shed.